© 2023 by SRSM. All copyrights owned by SRSM unless otherwise stated

  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon
alanharperstewart
Nov 1, 2019
Edited: Nov 1, 2019

The Politics of Worker' Control....part 1

Traditionally the SRSM's key demands were...

*An independent Scottish Socialist Republic

*Nuclear free and out of NATO

*Workers' control of industry

A few years ago we discussed this at an Ard Fheis and the final line became..."A democratic society based on a sustainable economy with workers' control."

And as a republican socialist I believe it is important to argue for workers' control.

Often socialism is associated with centralised state ownership and bureaucracy.

Look for instance at the example of the Attlee Government.

Between 1945 and 1951 coal, iron and steel, the Bank of England, civil aviation, railways and public utilities such as electricity, water and gas were all taken into public ownership.

And of course the NHS was set up.

Several million workers were affected.

The architect of the programme was Herbert Morrison, Deputy Prime Minister and President of the Board of Trade -Peter Mandelson's grandfather.

Morrison was on the right of the party and really nationalisation had very little to do with socialism.

Andrew Cumbers is Professor of Political Economy at Glasgow University -in the Adam Smith Business School. Cumbers explains that what really motivated Morrison was a desire to make Britain's capitalist economy more competitive after years of poor productivity and lack of investment by private owners.

Most of the industries -with the possible exception of steel and road haulage- were running at a loss or practically bankrupt.

So what the Morrisonian model of nationalisation was about was turning those industries round so they could make a profit. Ideas of democratising the industries and giving a voice to workers or ideas about empowering consumers and being receptive to their needs didn't enter Morrison's mind.

Rather existing structures of authority were left intact. Indeed the make up of the boardrooms was left alone also.

Take coal for instance. Lord Hyndley, Managing DIrector of one of the largest private mining companies Powell Duffryn, was made first Chairman on the National Coal Board.

*So with nationalisation it was often business as usual.

*It didn't seem like socialism.

*Rather it seemed like state capitalism.

*Few state enterprises -with the exception of the NHS- built up a strong and deep constituency of support.

*And workers felt just as alienated from their new employers.

 

0 comments0 replies
New Posts
  • alanharperstewart
    Dec 11, 2019

    The Battle of the Braes: How it led to Crofter's Rights!

    Discussion 
    In the early 1890's there was widespread discontentment amongst Highland crofters. They had little security of tenure. Few had written leases and many were dependent entirely on the goodwill of their landlords. All too often crofters were still moved off less fertile holdings to make way for sheep, grazing or for shooting. Many crofters also faced crippling poverty. Plots were too small to support families. But crofters were frequently prevented from increasing their holdings to a size that was sufficient and sustainable. Eventually matters did boil over. In April 1882 there was the Battle of the Braes on Skye at the foot of Ben Lee. Lord MacDonald tried to deprive crofters of some pasturage to which they claimed a right. Crofters then refused to pay rent. On 7th April an attempt was made to serve a "summonds of ejection" on them. The crofters responded by burning the "summonds" and by chasing off a sheriff's assistant. On 17th April some 50 Glasgow police officers were sent to effect the arrest of six ringleaders. They too were set upon by the crofters. The Government was worried. So much so that at one stage a gunboat appeared in Portree Harbour! Eventually, in March 1883, a Royal Commission was set up in response to the unrest. And in 1885 two Highland Land League candidates and three "independent Crofters" won seats in the North West of Scotland in that year's General Election. In 1886 the Crofters Act was passed as a result. It gave security of tenure to most smallholders in crofting communities. It also established a Crofting Commission to hear appeals and determine fair rents. Rents fell by 30% as a result. Arrears fell by 60%.
  • alanharperstewart
    Dec 11, 2019

    Battle of the Standard

    Discussion 
    Recently I was in North Yorkshire and by the A167 near Northallerton I came across a monument to a battle fought in 1138 that was called the "Battle of the Standard." The Battle had been the first major clash between England and Scotland for some 200 years. Yet it had been an "unusual" clash which had more to do with "internal English politics" than any "enmity between the two kingdoms" (Matthews 2003). In 1135 King Henry I of England had died. The Crown was left to his daughter Matilda. But in the event power was seized by King Henry's nephew, Count Stephen of Blois. Matilda had support though, including from her maternal uncle, King David I of Scotland. In 1138 King David decided to launch a full scale invasion with up to 25,000 men. Stephen was preoccupied with rebel barons in the south. So it was left to Archbishop Thurston of York and his priests to raise local militias in the north. Thurston revelled in this task. To fight the Scottish was "to do God's work" he said. Thurston also organised the construction of THE STANDARD. It consisted of a "large wagon pulled by an oxen on which was mounted a ship's mast." This would be used as a rallying point and it would give its' name to the Battle (Matthews 2003). The battle itself took place on 22 August 1138 at Cowton Moor, just north of Northallerton. There the English took up position on the crest of a hill. The Scots, attacking uphill, came under the withering fire of English archers. Thousands died. David, conceding defeat, had to withdraw. Back in Carlisle he regrouped and -despite having lost the battle- was able, within a month, to negotiate a "very favourable truce" (Ibbotson 2009).
  • alanharperstewart
    Dec 10, 2019

    Sir Walter Scott

    Discussion 
    Sir Walter Scott isn't everyone's cup of tea! Yet he does have some admirers on the left..Marxist George Luckas being one! Scott was born in Edinburgh in 1771 and went to the Royal High School and then on to University. After studying law he became an Advocate in 1792 and in 1799 was appointed Sheriff of Selkirk (be became a Clerk of Session in 1806). Increasingly however he was turning his hand to writing --poetry, ballads, novels. LAY OF THE LAST MINSTREL (1805) was an early narrative poem. And WQVERLEY, published anonymously in 1814, was his first novel. Thereafter Scott had a prodigious literary output. He had to pay for his lifestyle as a border laird based at Abbottsford. Plus Donnachie (2001) notes that he was a partner in Constable and Ballantyne, Edinburgh printers and publishers, who collapsed in 1826. He undertook to repay creditors a debt of £100,000. Worth a read is ROB ROY (1818) and A LEGEND OF MONTROSE (1819). But his best novel is perhaps REDGAUNTLET (1824) and it has a Jacobite theme exploring as it does tensions and divisions that divided Scotland in 1745!